FIFA - Football Tribunal Report 2024-25 - V9

Football Tribunal Report 2024/2025

SEPTEMBER 20252

Contents 1 . ForewordForeword 4 4 2. Overview 6 3 . Football T ribunal 10 3.1 Players’ Status Chamber 12 3.2 Dispute Resolution Chamber 14 3.2.1 Employment-related disputes 15 3.2.2 Claims for training rewards 16 3.3 Mediation 18 4. Regulatory applications 20 4.1 International T ransfer Certificate disputes 21 4.2 Validation exceptions for International T ransfer Certificates 21 4.3 Applications for the registration of minors 23 4.4 Eligibility decisions 29 4.5 Changes of association 31 5. National Dispute Resolution Chambers 33 Annexe 1 Composition of the Football T ribunal (judges and mediators) during the reporting period 36

1. Players’ Status Chamber 36

2. Dispute Resolution Chamber 37

3. Agents Chamber 39

4. Mediators 40

Annexe 2 Useful documents for the proceedings before the FT 41 Disclaimer 424 1 . Foreword1. Foreword 5 Dear members of the football family, It is with great pride that we present to you the fourth edition of the Football Tribunal Report. This report documents the activities and achievements of the FIFA Football Tribunal (FT) for the period between 1 July 2024 and 30 June 2025. The FT continues to provide an effective dispute resolution system for all members of the football community. It handles proceedings via the FIFA Legal Portal (the Legal Portal) and it processes regulatory applications via the Transfer Matching System (TMS). Over the past year, the FT has been involved in a number of developments that have been of consequence for the global football community. Firstly, following the introduction of the regulatory framework related to national dispute resolution chambers (NDRCs), the FT has already assessed and formally recognised several NDRCs as alternative forums for dispute resolution at national level under the auspices of FIFA’s regulations.

been of consequence for the global football community. Firstly, following the introduction of the regulatory framework related to national dispute resolution chambers (NDRCs), the FT has already assessed and formally recognised several NDRCs as alternative forums for dispute resolution at national level under the auspices of FIFA’s regulations. Secondly, the Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP) were amended with the introduction of the Interim Regulatory Framework, which entered into force in January 2025. The FT has therefore been working hard to develop its jurisprudence on the interpretation and application of these amendments to the RSTP. Thirdly, and as signposted in the previous edition of this report, the Disputes & Regulatory Applications Department (D&RA) has moved its operations to FIFA’s brand-new offices in Miami, United States, alongside the entire Legal & Compliance Division of FIFA. This new chapter has further enhanced the department’s ability to serve the football community, and the FT continues to provide high-quality services to all parties. As this report will show, the 2024/2025 period has surpassed previous reporting periods in terms of the volume of claims and regulatory applications, underscoring the trust placed in the FT’s processes. With over 21,000 cases, applications and enquiries received – a new record – the FT has reaffirmed its relevance as a cornerstone of the football community, as it continues to adjudicate employment and contractual disputes and matters relating to eligibility and registration. A full year has now passed since the next chapter of our journey started in Miami, and we remain steadfastly committed to our pursuit of quality, efficiency and the modernisation of the services provided by the FT to address the ever-evolving needs of global football. Y ours faithfully, FIFA Jan Kleiner Director of Football Regulatory Erika Montemor Ferreira Head of Disputes & Regulatory Applications6 2. Overview2. Overview 7 The FT has consolidated all previous FIFA decision-making bodies under the umbrella of a single unified body that consists of three chambers: 1

Jan Kleiner Director of Football Regulatory Erika Montemor Ferreira Head of Disputes & Regulatory Applications6 2. Overview2. Overview 7 The FT has consolidated all previous FIFA decision-making bodies under the umbrella of a single unified body that consists of three chambers: 1 Within the Legal & Compliance Division and the Football Regulatory Subdivision, the D&RA, formerly known as the Players’ Status Department (PSD), deals with disputes with an international dimension as well as regulatory applications that fall under the competence of the Players’ Status Chamber (PSC) and the Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC), acting as the secretariat to the FT. 2 As in the previous editions, this Football Tribunal Report 2024/2025 is aimed at providing a comprehensive overview of the activities of the chambers of the FT and of the FIFA administration in the period between 1 July 2024 and 30 June 2025. This report addresses the disputes and regulatory applications covered by the FIFA Statutes as well as in the RSTP and processed within the framework of the FIFA dispute resolution system in accordance with the Procedural Rules Governing the Football Tribunal (Procedural Rules) over the course of the corresponding timeframe. 1 The current composition of the chambers can be found in Annexe 1. 2 On 30 December 2023, the Bureau of the Council approved the worldwide temporary suspension of the FIFA Football Agent Regulations (FFAR) until the European Court of Justice renders a final decision in the pending proceedings concerning the regulations (cf. FIFA circular no. 1873). As article 20 of the FFAR is temporarily suspended, the Agents Chamber (AC) currently has no jurisdiction to hear disputes as would otherwise be provided in the FFAR. Consequently, the activities of the AC are not taken into account for the purposes of this report.

PLAYERS'

ST A TUS

CHAMBER

DISPUTE

RESOLUTION

CHAMBER

AGENTS

CHAMBER2. Overview 8 In view of the different competences, this report is divided into two core areas:

PLAYERS'

ST A TUS

CHAMBER

DISPUTE

RESOLUTION

CHAMBER

AGENTS

CHAMBER2. Overview 8 In view of the different competences, this report is divided into two core areas: a) dispute resolution, including contractual disputes involving players, coaches, clubs and Member Associations with an international dimension, as well as solidarity mechanism and training compensation matters; and b) registration and eligibility matters, including disputes over the release of international transfer certificates (ITCs), regulatory applications to change association, eligibility matters concerning playing for national teams, and applications to register minors. The period between 1 July 2024 and 30 June 2025 marked a new record for the D&RA, which received a total of 21,633 cases, applications and enquiries in this period. When it comes to regulatory applications, there was an overall increase of 13.3% compared to the previous period, which was primarily driven by the rising number of applications for the registration of minors, which grew by more than 2,000 additional cases compared to 2023/2024. We have also witnessed a record-breaking increase in the number of contractual and employment-related disputes submitted to both the PSC and the DRC, marking an all-time high with a 16.7% increase compared to the same period last year. In contrast, and as also noted in the previous report, the 2024/2025 period covered by this report saw a significant reduction in the number of claims for solidarity contributions and training compensation as a direct result of the implementation of the FIFA Clearing House and the relevant procedures.2. Overview 9 Figure 1: Cases, applications and enquiries received by the D&RA in 2024/2025 Dispute resolution 3,552

Players' Status Chamber 986 Dispute Resolution Chamber 2,566 Employment-related disputes 2,032 Solidarity contribution claims 316 T raining compensation claims 218 Regulatory applications 18,081 Validation exceptions 1,246 Applications for minors 16,581 Eligibility 119 Changes of association 135 To t a l 21,63310 3. Football T ribunal3. Football T ribunal 11 Through the FT and within the framework of the relevant regulations, FIFA provides decision-making services to the football stakeholders. The PSC and the DRC are the FIFA decision-making bodies that are competent to adjudicate on contractual disputes between Member Associations, clubs, players, coaches and licensed match agents, as well as on regulatory applications, in accordance with article 2 paragraph 1 of the Procedural Rules in combination with articles 22 and 23 of the RSTP. 3 The time it takes to process contractual disputes can vary significantly, depending on several factors, including the nature of the dispute, the complexity of the matter, the parties involved in the dispute and the existence of other factors, such as a counterclaim. Notably, since January 2021, the FIFA administration has also had the discretionary power to propose a settlement to the parties without the need for a formal decision in disputes without prima facie complex facts or legal issues, or in cases where there is clearly established jurisprudence, in order to shorten the time it takes to reach a resolution. On average, the time between the receipt of a duly filed claim and its resolution by means of a decision or an accepted proposal 4 was 88.7 days in the 2024/2025 period (90 days for cases under the competence of the PSC and 89.1 days for cases before the DRC). The numbers mentioned above demonstrate that the FIFA administration and the FT continue to provide one of the fastest and most efficient dispute resolution systems in the world. This is despite a steady increase in the number of incoming disputes, the heightened complexity of claims, and the implementation of new

the DRC). The numbers mentioned above demonstrate that the FIFA administration and the FT continue to provide one of the fastest and most efficient dispute resolution systems in the world. This is despite a steady increase in the number of incoming disputes, the heightened complexity of claims, and the implementation of new elements of the applicable regulatory framework. All in all, the FT continues to provide an efficient, specialised and accessible dispute resolution system for the global football family. 3 Three editions of the RSTP were in force during the period covered by this report, namely the June 2024, October 2024 and January 2025 editions. T wo editions of the Procedural Rules were in force during the reporting period, namely the March 2023 and January 2025 editions. Where relevant, this report indicates any particularities relating to the relevant edition. 4 Cf. article 20 of the Procedural Rules.3. Football T ribunal 12 Figure 2: Average processing time of contractual disputes resolved by a decision or an accepted proposal (in days) 3.1 Players’ Status Chamber According to article 22 paragraphs 1 c) and g) and article 23 paragraph 2 of the RSTP, the PSC is competent to hear contractual disputes between a club or an association and a coach of an international dimension, as well as disputes between clubs belonging to different associations. In 2024/2025, the number of claims received by the PSC reached a new all-time high, with a total of 986 claims. Figure 3: Claims received by the PSC by type 2021/2022 99.4 2021/2022 609 2020/2021 654 2023/2024 74.3 2023/2024 842 2022/2023 98.9 2022/2023 703 2024/2025 88.7 2024/2025 986 Coach Club v. club 40.6% 59.4%3. Football T ribunal 13 In addition, the number of claims resolved by the PSC also reached new heights in

98.9 2022/2023 703 2024/2025 88.7 2024/2025 986 Coach Club v. club 40.6% 59.4%3. Football T ribunal 13 In addition, the number of claims resolved by the PSC also reached new heights in 2024/2025, with a total of 882 claims. Just under half of these cases were resolved with a decision passed by the PSC, while 31% of the cases were closed for other reasons, e.g. because the parties reached an amicable settlement (either privately or through FIFA mediation), because the party concerned did not complete its claim, or because the claim could not be processed for other reasons. In 2024/2025, the proposals mechanism continued to be consistently effective, with 171 claims (19.4%) being resolved as the result of a proposal being accepted (or not rejected) by the parties. This percentage remains almost unchanged compared to the previous year, confirming the reliability and effectiveness of this expedited resolution pathway. Lastly, pursuant to article 19 of the RSTP and article 29 of the Procedural Rules, the PSC is also competent to adjudicate and resolve regulatory applications regarding: • international transfers or first registrations of minors (cf. art. 19. par. 4 of the RSTP); • limited minor exemption (LME) requests (cf. art. 19. par. 7 of the RSTP); • FIFA’s intervention to authorise player registrations, where referred by the FIFA general secretariat (cf. art. 14. par. 2 of Annexe 3 to the RSTP); • requests for eligibility (cf. art. 8 par. 2 b) of the Regulations Governing the Application of the FIFA Statutes (RGAS)); • change of association (cf. art. 10 par. 4 of the RGAS); and • the late return of players from representative-team duty (cf. art. 1 par. 10 of Annexe 1 to the RSTP).

Application of the FIFA Statutes (RGAS)); • change of association (cf. art. 10 par. 4 of the RGAS); and • the late return of players from representative-team duty (cf. art. 1 par. 10 of Annexe 1 to the RSTP). Figure 4: Claims resolved by the PSC by type of closure 2024/2025 882 2021/2022 676 2020/2021 681 2023/2024 813 2022/2023 729 19.4% 49.7% 31.0% Closed for other reasons Decided by judge Proposal accepted3. Football T ribunal 14 The relevant data on regulatory applications can be found in section 4 below. 3.2 Dispute Resolution Chamber The DRC provides dispute resolution based on equal representation of player and club representatives, along with the participation of an independent chairperson or deputy (cf. art. 4 par. 3 of the Procedural Rules). According to article 22 paragraphs 1 a), b), d), e) and f) and article 23 paragraph 1 of the RSTP, the DRC is competent to adjudicate on: • disputes between clubs and players in relation to the maintenance of contractual stability (cf. arts 13-18) where there has been an ITC request; • employment-related disputes between a club and a player of an international dimension; 5 • disputes relating to training compensation (cf. art. 20) and the solidarity mechanism (cf. art. 21) between clubs belonging to different associations; • disputes relating to training compensation (cf. art. 20) and the solidarity mechanism (cf. art. 21) between clubs belonging to the same association, provided that the transfer of a player at the basis of the dispute occurs between clubs belonging to different associations; and • matters of legal or factual complexity in an Electronic Player Passport (EPP) review process in accordance with article 10 paragraph 3 of the FIFA Clearing House Regulations (FCHR) and disputes between clubs in accordance with

clubs belonging to different associations; and • matters of legal or factual complexity in an Electronic Player Passport (EPP) review process in accordance with article 10 paragraph 3 of the FIFA Clearing House Regulations (FCHR) and disputes between clubs in accordance with article 18 paragraph 2 of the FCHR. Since November 2022, all payments related to training compensation and the solidarity mechanism that fall under the FCHR have been processed exclusively via the FIFA Clearing House. Equally, the EPP process and claims regarding training rewards are conducted entirely through TMS as per the FCHR and the Procedural Rules. Since May 2023, all other contractual and employment-related disputes are conducted exclusively through the Legal Portal. 5 On 18 January 2024, FIFA introduced the new National Dispute Resolution Chamber Recognition Principles, incorporating the new National Dispute Resolution Chamber Standard Regulations (see FIFA circular no. 1876). As of January 2025, the parties to a dispute are allowed to explicitly opt in writing for such disputes to be decided by an NDRC, or a national dispute resolution body operating under an equivalent name, that has been officially recognised by FIFA. Any jurisdiction clause of this nature must be exclusive and included either directly in the relevant contract or in a collective bargaining agreement applicable to the parties.3. Football T ribunal 15 3.2.1 Employment-related disputes In 2024/2025, the DRC received a total of 2,032 employment-related disputes between players and clubs, which represented an increase of 17.1% compared to the previous year. Furthermore, the number of claims that the DRC resolved reached a new record in 2024/2025, with 1,800 claims resolved in total – an increase of 8.2% compared to the 2023/2024 period. More than 50% of these 1,800 claims were decided upon by the DRC, and a further 24.4% were closed for other reasons. The remaining 360 claims (20%) were resolved after a proposal from FIFA was accepted (or not rejected) by the

the 2023/2024 period. More than 50% of these 1,800 claims were decided upon by the DRC, and a further 24.4% were closed for other reasons. The remaining 360 claims (20%) were resolved after a proposal from FIFA was accepted (or not rejected) by the parties. This constitutes an increase of 0.8% in the number of successful proposals compared to 2023/2024, and confirms the positive trend in the success rate of proposals year-on-year. Figure 5: Employment-related disputes received by the DRC Figure 6: Employment-related disputes resolved by the DRC by type of closure 2021/2022 1,390 2020/2021 1,187 2023/2024 1,736 2022/2023 1,478 2024/2025 2,032 2024/2025 1,800 2021/2022 1,368 2020/2021 1,090 2023/2024 1,663 2022/2023 1,590 20.0% 55.6% 24.4% Closed for other reasons Decided by judge Proposal accepted3. Football T ribunal 16 3.2.2 Claims for training rewards Since the launch of the FIFA Clearing House on 16 November 2022, the distribution of training rewards related to international transfers, first professional registrations and domestic transfers with an international dimension have been conducted via the EPP process, and these training rewards have been paid through the FIFA Clearing House entity based in Paris. Training rewards claims that may be lodged with the FT may therefore only concern transfers that occurred before 16 November 2022. Exceptionally, claims may be lodged in relation to transfers that occurred from 16 November 2022 and in respect of which a training club invokes the provisions of article 18 paragraph 2 of the FCHR. This explains why the number of training rewards claims submitted through TMS before the FT has almost halved (534 claims for training rewards were submitted

in relation to transfers that occurred from 16 November 2022 and in respect of which a training club invokes the provisions of article 18 paragraph 2 of the FCHR. This explains why the number of training rewards claims submitted through TMS before the FT has almost halved (534 claims for training rewards were submitted through TMS in 2024/2025, whilst 1,044 claims were submitted in 2023/2024). Figure 7: Claims for training rewards received Solidarity contribution Training compensation 2023/2024 1,044 30.7% 69.3% 2022/2023 2,248 27.1% 72.9% 2021/2022 1,976 28.1% 71.9% 2020/2021 2,145 29.9% 70.1% 2024/2025 534 59.2% 40.8%3. Football T ribunal 17 As a direct consequence of this decrease, the number of resolved claims for training rewards was also much lower than in the previous period (-48.9%). Furthermore, in 2024/2025 alone, 19,174 EPPs were generated, 92.2% of which had already been resolved at the time of publication. The majority of EPPs were related to training compensation triggered by a first professional registration. If we filter out EPPs discarded in the initial phases, most EPPs leading to actual entitlements stem from international transfers. Solidarity contribution Training compensation 2023/2024 1,195 31.0% 69.0% 2022/2023 2,114 25.8% 74.2% 2021/2022 2,054 29.2% 70.8% 2020/2021 2,209 30.3% 69.7% 2024/2025 611 57.9% 42.1% Solidarity contribution Training compensation Both 35.8% 53.4% 10.8% Figure 8: Claims for training rewards resolved

2,209 30.3% 69.7% 2024/2025 611 57.9% 42.1% Solidarity contribution Training compensation Both 35.8% 53.4% 10.8% Figure 8: Claims for training rewards resolved Figure 9: EPPs generated in 2024/2025 by type of training reward3. Football T ribunal 18 Figure 10: EPPs generated in 2024/2025 by type of trigger event 3.3 Mediation In February 2023, FIFA introduced the ability to access mediation in respect of disputes lodged before the FT. The FIFA Mediation Project is designed to enable parties to amicably resolve their disputes with the assistance of a mediator. The service is voluntary, strictly confidential and free of charge and is conducted by highly skilled mediators (listed in Annexe 1) in accordance with the FIFA Mediation Guidelines. Although some parties still appear to be reluctant to engage in mediation, the project is seemingly becoming more successful. The figures show a steady increase in the number of cases submitted to mediation, rising from 12 in 2022/2023 to 16 in 2023/2024, and then to 25 in 2024/2025. This upward trajectory reflects a growing awareness and acceptance of mediation as a viable alternative to formal adjudication. Importantly, the number of successful outcomes has increased significantly. While 2023/2024 saw a slight dip in successful mediations (five cases), the 2024/2025 period was characterised by a marked recovery as 17 cases were successfully mediated. This suggests that not only are more parties engaging with the process, but also that mediation is becoming more effective. Overall, while the system is evolving at its own pace, the data points to positive trends in terms of both participation and resolution, highlighting the growing credibility and impact of FIFA’s mediation service. FIFA remains committed to this process and is currently studying viable options to further increase the efficiency of the project, aiming to increase participation and improve outcomes. First professional registration

trends in terms of both participation and resolution, highlighting the growing credibility and impact of FIFA’s mediation service. FIFA remains committed to this process and is currently studying viable options to further increase the efficiency of the project, aiming to increase participation and improve outcomes. First professional registration Domestic transfer International transfer 3,582 6,960 8,6323. Football T ribunal 19 Figure 11: Mediation cases initiated by outcome/status Mediation successful Mediation ongoing 2023/2024 16 11 5 2022/2023 12 6 6 Concluded without agreement 2024/2025 25 6 17 220 4. Regulatory applications4. Regulatory applications 21 4.1 International T ransfer Certificate disputes In previous reports, disputes arising from the refusal to issue an ITC were presented as a separate case category. These disputes typically involved situations where a former association rejected an ITC request and the matter was escalated to the PSC for a decision on the registration of the player. However, following the approval of the Interim Regulatory Framework by the Bureau of the Council on 22 December 2024 (cf. FIFA circular no. 1917), this category of cases has been removed. The amended provisions of article 11 of Annexe 3 to the RSTP introduced a simplified ITC procedure that no longer permits Member Associations to reject the issuance of an ITC and therefore eliminates the possibility of ITC disputes between two Member Associations. Instead, the former association must issue the ITC within 72 hours, failing which the new association may proceed with the registration directly in TMS. FIFA’s intervention is now limited to exceptional circumstances and the player’s registration can no longer be rejected on the basis of a contractual dispute. Accordingly, ITC refusals no longer exist as a dispute type, and the overview of disputes in this report therefore focuses exclusively on contractual disputes. 4.2 Validation exceptions for International T ransfer Certificates Every international transfer must take place within a registration period (colloquially

a contractual dispute. Accordingly, ITC refusals no longer exist as a dispute type, and the overview of disputes in this report therefore focuses exclusively on contractual disputes. 4.2 Validation exceptions for International T ransfer Certificates Every international transfer must take place within a registration period (colloquially known as a “transfer window”) set by the Member Association and entered in TMS. Subject to article 6 paragraph 3 of the RSTP, if a Member Association requests an ITC outside of a transfer window, or if the club that wishes to register the player is serving a registration ban imposed by a FIFA decision, TMS will automatically prevent this registration from being duly executed by triggering what is called a “validation exception”. For the avoidance of doubt, a validation exception occurs whenever: • the player is less than 18 years old and the corresponding minor application has not yet been accepted; • a club serving a registration ban enters a transfer instruction related to the engagement of a player; • the new club and/or the former club has exceeded the loan limitations (cf. art. 10 of the RSTP); or • the association of the engaging club requests a player’s ITC outside of the registration period defined in TMS; and in circumstances in which the exceptions set out in article 6 paragraph 3 of the RSTP are not applicable.4. Regulatory applications 22 In the 2024/2025 period, a total of 2,432 ITC requests triggered the automated TMS mechanism. Requests for the D&RA to override a validation exception were lodged in 1,246 of these cases and, of those, more than 70% related to transfers outside of the registration period. The number of transfers with validation exceptions that were authorised by the D&RA in 2024/2025 increased by more than 10%, with a total of 1,005 cases of this nature. Figure 12: Intervention requests received by the D&RA in 2024/2025 by type of validation exception Figure 13: Authorisations of transfers with validation exceptions by the D&RA 2020/2021

Figure 12: Intervention requests received by the D&RA in 2024/2025 by type of validation exception Figure 13: Authorisations of transfers with validation exceptions by the D&RA 2020/2021 1,523 956 567 2021/2022 954 937 Transfer outside of registration period (amateur) Transfer outside of registration period (professional, club-to-club) Transfer outside of registration period (professional, out-of-contract) Loan cap limitations exceeded Minor application pending Transfer ban active 200 22 225 75 535 189 COVID-19 registration period authorisations Other authorisations 2022/2023 938 938 2023/2024 899 899 2024/2025 1,005 1,0054. Regulatory applications 23 4.3 Applications for the registration of minors In addition to its exclusive role in all transfers related to 11-a-side football, TMS also plays a major part in monitoring and authorising the international movements of minor players (cf. art. 30 of the Procedural Rules). The term “minor” is defined as any player who has not yet reached the age of 18 (cf. definition 11 of the RSTP). As a general rule, international transfers and first registrations of players whose nationality is other than the one where the football association operates are only permitted if the player is over the age of 18 (cf. art. 19 par. 1 and art. 19 par. 3 of the RSTP). However, there are exceptions to this rule. The following list of exceptions is exhaustive: a) The player’s parents have moved to the country where the player wants to register, for reasons not linked to football (cf. art. 19 par. 2 a) of the RSTP); b) The player is aged between 16 and 18 and is moving within the territory of the EU/EEA or between two associations within the same country and the new club satisfies certain conditions (cf. art. 19 par. 2 b) of the RSTP);

b) The player is aged between 16 and 18 and is moving within the territory of the EU/EEA or between two associations within the same country and the new club satisfies certain conditions (cf. art. 19 par. 2 b) of the RSTP); c) Both the player’s domicile and the new club are within 50km of their common border and the distance between the two is no greater than 100km (cf. art. 19 par. 2 c) of the RSTP); d) The player is moving due to humanitarian reasons without their parents and could not be expected to return to their country of origin (cf. art. 19 par. 2 d) of the RSTP); e) The player is moving temporarily without their parents for academic reasons in order to undertake an exchange programme, and the duration of the player’s registration will not exceed one year (cf. art. 19 par. 2 e) of the RSTP); or f ) The player has lived continuously for at least the last five years in the country in which they wish to be registered (cf. art. 19 pars 3 and 4 c) of the RSTP).4. Regulatory applications 24 When the engaging association receives a case that falls under any of the exceptions listed above, and wishes to register a minor whose nationality is other than the one of the country in which that association operates, it must submit an application to the PSC through TMS in one of the following two instances (cf. art. 19 par. 4 of the RSTP):

1. International transfer: a minor of any nationality who has previously been registered with a club affiliated to one association and now wishes to be registered with a club affiliated to another association.

2. First registration: a minor who has never previously been registered with a club and is not a national of the country in which they wish to be registered for the first time.

Due to th