OEA - CP - Resolución CSH GT TP Doc 2 rev 4

PERMANENT COUNCIL OF THE OAS/Ser.G

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES CSH/GT/TP/doc.2/25 rev. 4 1 April 2026

COMMITTEE ON HEMISPHERIC SECURITY Original: español Working Group on Trafficking in Persons (2024-2026)

PROPOSED INDICATORS

THIRD WORK PLAN FOR COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSES

TO HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE

[2023-2028]

(THIRD WORK PLAN ON TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS)

(On February 10 the delegation of Colombia advised that it was ad referendum on the entire document. On the same day the delegation of Chile expressed its reservation on the entire document. On March 24, the delegation of Paraguay announced that the whole document was under consultation)Proposed Indicators

THIRD WORK PLAN FOR COMPREHENSIVE RESPONSES

TO HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE

[2023-2028]

(THIRD WORK PLAN ON TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS)

CONTENTS

INTRODUCCIÓN 1

PROPUESTA DE INDICADORES 3

INDICADORES PROPUESTOS PARA EL EJE DE PREVENCIÓN 5

INDICADORES PROPUESTOS PARA EL EJE DE PERSECUCIÓN (COMBATE

Y SANCIÓN) 38

INDICADORES PROPUESTOS PARA EL EJE DE PROTECCIÓN Y

ASISTENCIA 83

INDICADORES PROPUESTOS PARA EL EJE DE INFORMACIÓN Y

CONOCIMIENTO 139

INDICADORES PROPUESTOS PARA EL EJE DE COOPERACIÓN 154Introduction The Third Work Plan on Trafficking contains 103 Guidelines under five headings (Table 1).

The Heading that has the most Guidelines is Heading No. Six (VI) on Protection and Assistance, followed by Heading No. Four (IV) on Prevention and, in third place, Heading No. Five (V) on Prosecution. Heading No. Seven (VII) on Information and Knowledge, with 12 Guidelines, and Heading No. Eight (VIII) on Cooperation, with four Guidelines. This proposal responds to mandate number eight of Section IX of the Third Work Plan, which established the mandates assigned to the OAS General Secretariat.

8. Develop indicators to measure progress in the implementation of this Work Plan and submit them to the member states for approval.

In addition, having a series of indicators that make it possible to measure progress in the implementation of the Third Work Plan is a sine qua non condition for fulfilling two other mandates assigned to the General Secretariat in the same Section IX:

9. Publish biennial reports based on the indicators developed to monitor progress in the implementation of this Plan.

10. Share the reports mentioned in the previous paragraph with the national authorities on trafficking in persons.

Although the Plan has 103 Guidelines, the proposal that follows consists of 44 indicators. It was decided to reduce the number of indicators because a monitoring mechanism with 103 indicators, one for each Guideline, would have been unfeasible and unsustainable. For this reason, prior to the work of designing the indicators, it was decided to conduct an exercise of thematic grouping, prioritization, and identification of the object of study to be measured. Despite this effort, some Guidelines (28) were left out of the exercise largely due to the difficulty of grouping them under the same thematic heading. The 44 indicators proposal covers 75 Guidelines, which represents 72% of the total (Table 2). It is hoped that this decision will expedite and make it easier to implement the proposed indicator mechanism. Table 1 Heading No. Name Guidelines IV Prevention 28 V Prosecution 21 VI Protection and Assistance 38 VII Information and Knowledge 12 VIII Cooperation 4 Total 1032Table 2 Heading No. Heading Name Total Guidelines Covers Not covered VI Protection and Assistance

Name Guidelines IV Prevention 28 V Prosecution 21 VI Protection and Assistance 38 VII Information and Knowledge 12 VIII Cooperation 4 Total 1032Table 2 Heading No. Heading Name Total Guidelines Covers Not covered VI Protection and Assistance 38 29 9 V Prosecution 21 17 4 IV Prevention 28 17 11 VII Information and Knowledge 12 9 3 VIII Cooperation 4 3 1 Total 103 75 28 The Guidelines Heading with the most indicators is Heading No. Six (VI) on Protection and Assistance with 16 indicators. In second place is Heading No. Five (V) on Prosecution with 12 indicators. Third is the Prevention Heading (IV) with 10 indicators. The second-to-last Heading is Information and Knowledge (VII) with 5 indicators and, finally, the seventh Heading (VII) is Cooperation, with a single indicator (Table 4). Table 4 Heading No. Heading Name Total Guidelines No. of Indicators VI Protection and Assistance 38 16 V Prosecution 21 12 IV Prevention 28 10 VII Information and Knowledge 12 5 VIII Cooperation 4 1 Total 103 44 Compared to the Second Plan, we would be working with a smaller number of indicators, despite the fact that the Third Plan has two additional Headings (Table 5). Table 5 2nd Plan 3rd Plan Headings 3 5 Guidelines 50 103 Structure 62 44 Of the 44 indicators proposed for the Third Trafficking Plan, 17 are capacity indicators, 16 are output indicators, eight are outcome indicators, and three are process indicators.- 339%

36% 18% 7% Proposed indicators by type of indicator Capacidad Producto Resultado Proceso Proposed Indicators The indicators proposed are based on the five Headings of the Plan. For each Heading, a summary list of the proposed indicators is presented. After the executive statement, it is possible to click on the Fact Sheet to obtain more information and details regarding the design of the indicator. The Technical Sheet of the indicators comprises six main categories:

1. Presentation

2. Description

3. Data collection

4. Baseline

5. Guidelines

6. Limits In turn, three of those six categories include additional information fields:

Presentation 1. • Name of indicator • Type of indicator • Level of difficulty Description • Definition • Measurement unit • Type of data

• Disaggregation • Goal Data collection • Source of data • Data gathering method • Reporting frequency • Verification method4Each technical data sheet has a different color, according to the Heading it comes under:

Color Heading No. Heading Name Blue Heading IV Prevention Orange Heading V Prosecution Violet Heading VI Protection and Assistance Pink Heading VII Information and Knowledge Green Heading VIII Cooperation Following the methodology for the revision of the proposed indicators (document CSH/GT/TP/doc.1/25), the indicators will be considered in three groups: Protection and Assistance Heading (Group 1); Prosecution Heading (Group 2); and Prevention, Information and Knowledge, and Cooperation Headings (Group 3). The indicators corresponding to each group will be published as an addendum to this document.- 5Proposed indicators for the Prevention Heading Heading Four (IV) on Prevention has 28 Guidelines. The proposal contains PER: 4 10] indicators for this Heading. These indicators cover the measurement of 14 Guidelines and leave out 11 Guidelines (22, 24, 29, 30, 32, 35, 44, 46, 48, and 49).1 / At the same time, progress in the implementation of

this Heading. These indicators cover the measurement of 14 Guidelines and leave out 11 Guidelines (22, 24, 29, 30, 32, 35, 44, 46, 48, and 49).1 / At the same time, progress in the implementation of Guidelines 36 and 37 may be measured by two indicators included in the Heading on Prosecution (5.8 and 5.6, respectively). Along the same lines, progress in the implementation of Guideline 45 can be measured by an indicator designed for the Protection and Assistance Heading (6.12). Below is the list of indicators proposed for the Prevention Heading and the link to the Technical Sheet of each of them: 4.1 Degree to which the national legislative framework on trafficking in persons is in line with the provisions of the Palermo Convention and its Protocol against Trafficking in Persons. [PER: suggests modifying; see technical data sheet] See Technical Data Sheet Agreed upon on February 10, 2026, goal pending review 4.2 Number of measures taken by public institutions (or in partnership with the private sector, academic institutions, or civil society organizations) to prevent and reduce the risk of victimization by trafficking in persons in vulnerable population groups. [ PER: Suggests elimination, as it is overly general and has limited potential impact under the proposed terms.] See Technical Data Sheet 4.3 Number of [DOM: national] victims of trafficking in persons without documentation who received identity documents because they did not have them. [ PER: Suggests relocating this indicator to the Protection and Assistance Heading] See technical data sheet 4.4 Degree of implementation of campaigns with a differentiated approach, disseminated through accessible and culturally relevant channels and aimed at five major types of content. [PER: suggests modifying; see technical data sheet] See Technical Data Sheet Agreed upon on February 10, 2026,

goal pending review 4.5 Number of information products created by the government institutions responsible for human trafficking issues dealing with the that address new forms of the crime of human trafficking, including its connection to the trafficking through digital environment and information and communication technologies (ICTs). [PER: Suggests deleting, since its content is already partially incorporated in another formula, generating redundancy]. See Technical Data Sheet Agreed upon on February 10, 2026, goal pending review 4.6 Percentage of Ministries that established specific due diligence clauses on trafficking in persons, forced labor, and labor exploitation in the terms of reference of public tenders and contracts to be signed with suppliers and contractors. [PER: Suggests deletion as it has limited potential for impact under the proposed terms]. See Technical Data Sheet Agreed upon on February 10, 2026, goal pending review

1 . In a constructive way, it is noted that three of these 11 Guidelines (35, 48, and 49) should be in the Prosecution Heading.- 64.7 Percentage of officially registered companies that implemented due diligence measures to prevent human trafficking in their supply chains. [ PER: Suggests deletion as it has limited potential for impact under the proposed terms]. See Technical Data Sheet Agreed upon on February 10, 2026, goal pending review 4.8 Number of measures adopted to regulate and monitor travel or tourism agencies, employment or hiring. [PER: suggests modifying; see technical data sheet] See Technical Data Sheet 4.9 Number of communicators trained in the crime of trafficking in persons by government institutions responsible for issues relating to the crime of trafficking in persons in order to improve the quality of media coverage and dissemination of cases of trafficking in persons. PER: suggests modifying, see technical data sheet

See Technical Data Sheet Agreed upon on February 10, 2026, goal pending review 4.10 Level of institutionalization of the participation of victims of trafficking in persons in efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in persons and to assist and protect victims. [PER: Suggests deletion as it has limited potential for impact under the proposed terms]. See Technical Data Sheet Agreed upon on February 10, 2026, goal pending review7INDICATOR DATA SHEET IV . Prevention Heading Name of Indicator: 4.1 [PER: Degree to which the national legislative framework on trafficking in persons is in line with the provisions of the Palermo Convention and its Protocol against Trafficking in Persons. Degree of inclusion of the provisions of the Palermo Convention and its Protocol against Trafficking in Persons in the national legislative framework]

Indicator Type: Capability Indicator

Difficulty level: Low DESCRIPTION Definition: The indicator seeks to measure the degree [PER: to which national laws against trafficking in persons are in line with the provisions of the Palermo Convention and its Protocol against Trafficking in Persons of inclusion of the provisions of the Palermo Convention and its Protocol against Trafficking in Persons]. The index contemplates three variables: ( PER: Indicator formula:) a) Legislation adopted criminalizing all forms of trafficking in persons, as defined in article 3 of the Trafficking in Persons Protocol: exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labor or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or removal of organs. b) Legislation passed where the definition of the crime includes the acts, means, and purposes of the crime. c) Approved legislation that contemplates three regulatory adjustments to the definition of the crime:

1. That, in the event that the victims are children and adolescents, the means for the configuration of trafficking in persons are not required. ii. That the movement of the person is not required for an act to constitute a crime of trafficking in persons. iii. That proof of coercion, fraud, or compulsion is not required to determine that it is a crime of human trafficking.

Weight of the variables: Variable A: 35

Variable B: 35

Variable C: 30

persons. iii. That proof of coercion, fraud, or compulsion is not required to determine that it is a crime of human trafficking.

Weight of the variables: Variable A: 35

Variable B: 35

Variable C: 30

In Variable A, each type of trafficking is worth 7 points (proportional score). If the national legislation typifies the 5 types, it obtains 35 points. In Variable B, each element (acts/means/purposes) is worth 11.67 points (proportional score). If the definition of the crime includes all three components, it gets 35 points. In Variable C, non-linear values are graded as follows: 0 adaptations → 0 pts 1 adaptation → 8 pts82 adaptations → 18 pts 3 adaptations → 30 pts This allocation avoids inflating scores of countries that only partially meet these adjustments and therefore tends to reward full compliance.

Calculation formula: X=

Score A + Score B + Score C 100 Scoring and interpretation scale Score Status Interpretation 90-100 [DPS1 : Full compliance Full regulatory adequacy] The legislative framework is fully aligned with the Palermo Convention and its Protocol. 75-80 [DPS: High Advanced regulatory adequacy] The legislative framework is very close to complete adequacy, only some aspects needs to be considered or included. 50-74 [DPS: Medium Intermediate regulatory adequacy] The legislative framework covers several key aspects, but there are still significant shortcomings. 25-49 ]DPS: Low Basic regulatory adequacy] The legislative framework covers some aspects, but central elements are missing. 0-20 [DPS: Very low Incipient regulatory adequacy] The legislative framework only covers one of the essential elements.

[DPS2 : The scale reflects the degree to which the national legislative framework is aligned with the standards established in the Palermo Convention and its Protocol against Trafficking in Persons.]

Measurement Unit: Index

Incipient regulatory adequacy] The legislative framework only covers one of the essential elements.

[DPS2 : The scale reflects the degree to which the national legislative framework is aligned with the standards established in the Palermo Convention and its Protocol against Trafficking in Persons.]

Measurement Unit: Index Data type: [PER: Quali-quantitative] Disaggregation: Not applicable Goal: [DPS3 : To achieve full compliance with the Palermo Protocol at the end of "x" period of time. Within four years from the establishment of the baseline, the country’s legislative framework achieves full compliance with the Palermo Convention and its Protocol against Trafficking in Persons, according to the criteria established in the indicator.

Countries already at full compliance at the baseline measurement will be considered as having met the goal] DATA COLLECTION Data source: National laws, official gazettes Data collection method: Documentary review Frequency of reporting: [DPS4 : Every 4 years Every 2 years] Verification method: Copy or transcription of the articles or subsections that account for compliance with variables a) to e).- 9BASELINE Baseline/Year: GUIDELINES Guideline 23: Establish, update and/or strengthen specific national legislation on trafficking in persons, as well as policies or programs in this area, in accordance with the provisions of the Palermo Convention and its Protocol against Trafficking in Persons, in order to criminalize all forms of trafficking in persons; provide a clear definition of it, including the acts, means and purposes of the crime and that, in the case of child victims, that the means for the configuration of trafficking in persons are not required, and that the movement of the person is not required for an act to constitute a crime of trafficking in persons or proof of coercion, fraud or compulsion. Guideline 40: Promote legislative and other measures to define all forms of exploitation arising from trafficking in persons, in line with the Trafficking in Persons Protocol; promote access to comprehensive information on the human rights of victims, as well as ways to report and provide victims and survivors of trafficking with access to necessary assistance. Guideline 50: Enact appropriate and comprehensive legislation criminalizing all forms of trafficking in persons,

in persons, in line with the Trafficking in Persons Protocol; promote access to comprehensive information on the human rights of victims, as well as ways to report and provide victims and survivors of trafficking with access to necessary assistance. Guideline 50: Enact appropriate and comprehensive legislation criminalizing all forms of trafficking in persons, as defined in article 3 of the Trafficking in Persons Protocol, supplementing the Palermo Convention, which includes penalties proportionate to other serious crimes referred to in this Convention and does not allow for administrative sanctions in lieu of imprisonment. [Prosecution Heading] Guideline 51: Adopt national anti-trafficking laws that clearly define and criminalize trafficking in persons in accordance with the Trafficking in Persons Protocol, which does not require movement for an act to constitute a trafficking offense and does not require evidence of force, fraud or coercion in cases involving children. [Prosecution Heading] LIMITATIONS Limited political priority. The crime of trafficking in persons may not be considered a priority by the government in power, which may result in the allocation of insufficient resources for the development, updating, or strengthening of the national legislative framework. [PER: The indicator should be defined not only in terms of the problem it seeks to measure, but also in its methodological design. In that regard, the assignment of weights to variables A, B, and C is arbitrary, as it does not reflect their relative importance, but rather criteria of ease of calculation. This methodological decision also reflects the absence of evidence or literature to support a standardized process for assigning weights. Date of creation of the indicator's technical sheet: April 2025

DPS First Revision Date: July 2025

DPS Second Revision Date: August 2025

The changes proposed by Guatemala and Ecuador were accepted. Indicator agreed upon on February 10, 2026. DPS2 based on Colombia’s comments, included on February 27, 2026.

Goal pending review. Back10INDICATOR DATA SHEET IV . Prevention Heading Name of Indicator: 4.2 Number of measures taken by public institutions (or in partnership with the private sector, academic institutions, or civil society organizations) to prevent and reduce the risk of victimization by trafficking in persons in vulnerable population groups. [PER: suggests eliminating this indicator]

Indicator Type: Product Indicator

Difficulty level: Medium DESCRIPTION Definition: The indicator seeks to measure the number of preventive measures implemented by public institutions

(or with the support of private sector entities, academic institutions or civil society organizations) to inform, educate and sensitize population groups at risk and to reduce risk factors that exacerbate conditions of vulnerability at the national level or in the countries identified with the highest incidence of nationals as victims. Preventive measures are understood as: dissemination, awareness-raising and sensitization campaigns, educational programs, and reduction of risk factors, social protection actions, community training, etc. [DPS: Criteria for counting a measure An action or activity may be counted when at least the following parameters are met:  Institutional implementation. It must be executed or coordinated by a public institution, either directly or in partnership with civil society organizations, the private sector, or academic institutions.  Explicit preventive objective. It should be oriented toward prevention of human trafficking through: ‒ Information ‒ Education ‒ Awareness raising ‒ Reduction of risk factors  Focus on at-risk populations. It must target one or more groups identified as vulnerable in the Plan.  Verifiable level of implementation. The measure must be under execution or have been implemented during the reporting period.  National scope or focused on risk contexts. It can be implemented at the national or local level, or in relation to countries where there is a higher incidence of national victims. Measures not that will not be considered:  Isolated, one-off events  Public statements  Activities not implemented  Actions that do not target at-risk populations]

Measurement Unit: Number of Preventive Measures Data Type: Quantitative Disaggregation: By population group, by type of measure, by type of partner organization, by scope

 Isolated, one-off events  Public statements  Activities not implemented  Actions that do not target at-risk populations]

Measurement Unit: Number of Preventive Measures Data Type: Quantitative Disaggregation: By population group, by type of measure, by type of partner organization, by scope

(national or "international")- 11Goal: [DPS: Implement at least "x" number of measures with a territorial and differential approach. Within four years after the establishment of the baseline, the country has adopted at least five measures to prevent and reduce the risk of victimization by trafficking in persons in vulnerable population groups.] DATA COLLECTION Data source: Government documents including records and reports of activities, inter-institutional and intersectoral agreements and agreements (with the private sector, academia and civil society) for the implementation of the measures. Reports on activities of the private sector, the academic sector and civil society organizations involved in the implementation of the measures. Notes, articles, press and communication actions informing about the implementation of the measures.

Data collection method: Documentary review and media monitoring.

Frequency of reporting: Every 2 years Verification method: Copy of reports, covenants, agreements, letters, and MoU. Links to press releases, articles and press and communication actions

BASELINE

Baseline/Year: GUIDELINES Guideline 25: Identify specific population groups at risk of human trafficking, such as women, children, LGBTQI+ people, people of African descent, indigenous peoples and communities, other traditionally marginalized populations, migrants and refugees, persons with disabilities, people with substance abuse disorders, and other subgroups, and take measures to prevent and reduce the likely to become victims of the crime of trafficking in persons and, if applicable, ensure that comprehensive systems are in place for their assistance and comprehensive protection on an ongoing basis.

Guideline 27: Implement - with greater emphasis on vulnerable or at-risk population groups - dissemination, awareness-raising and sensitization campaigns aimed at society in general, which take into account the effects of trauma and that are adapted and correspond to the age, gender, disability and culture of the victim, that highlight trends and combat false information about risk factors that lead to human trafficking, and that provide information on the legal and criminal consequences for the perpetrators of this crime, in cooperation with civil society, survivor leaders and other social actors. Guideline 31: Implement or strengthen public policies at the country level, stimulating the creation or consolidation of support networks at the local level and promoting interventions to educate about the risk factors of trafficking in persons and related crimes, involving key actors and community leaders to join efforts in this field. Guideline 41: Take measures to prevent the most prevalent forms of trafficking in persons in Member States and pay attention to lesser-known forms of exploitation, new trends in trafficking and the impact on specific groups of persons. Guideline 45: Design and implement prevention actions aimed at reducing cases of trafficking in persons at the domestic level (trafficking at the national level), as well as the strengthening of actions with countries identified with a higher incidence of foreign persons as victims.- 12LIMITATIONS Heterogeneity in the definition of preventive measure. There are significant variations in what each country defines and conceives as a preventive measure to address risk factors, which may affect the comparability of results. Insufficient characterization of populations at risk. The absence or weakness in the explicit identification of population groups at risk makes it difficult to apply the indicator homogeneously and to calculate it consistently across countries. Date of creation of the indicator's technical sheet: April 2025

DPS First Revision Date: July 2025

DPS Second Revision Date: August 2025

On February 13, 2026, Ecuador withdrew its comment on the verification method. Back13INDICATOR DATA SHEET IV . Prevention Heading Name of Indicator: 4.3 Number of [DOM: national] victims of trafficking in persons without documentation who received identity documents because they did not have them.

On February 13, 2026, Ecuador withdrew its comment on the verification method. Back13INDICATOR DATA SHEET IV . Prevention Heading Name of Indicator: 4.3 Number of [DOM: national] victims of trafficking in persons without documentation who received identity documents because they did not have them. [DOM: Recommends reviewing this indicator, specifically when it refers to national victims without documentation. Instead, it suggests that the word "nationals" be removed, so that it covers victims identified without documentation and who require identity documentation.] [ PER: Percentage of undocumented national victims of trafficking in persons accessing free identification services and obtaining valid identity documents] [URY , PER: Considers that this indicator should be under the Protection and Assistance Heading].

Indicator Type: Product Indicator

Difficulty level: Low DESCRIPTION Definition: The indicator measures the number of national victims of trafficking in persons who, as part of their assistance process, have received official identity documents out of the total number of registered and undocumented national victims of trafficking in persons. The delivery of identity documents can include birth certificates, identification certificates, passports, and other documents that confirm a person's identity. Identity documents are essential for victims to access health, education, employment and legal assistance, as well as facilitate their social and economic reintegration.

[DPS: A national victim of human trafficking is considered to have received documentation if, during the reporting period, the person obtains valid identity documents, including:  First-time issuance  Renewal of expired documents  Replacement of lost or damaged documents

Indicator formula: [PER:

[DPS: A national victim of human trafficking is considered to have received documentation if, during the reporting period, the person obtains valid identity documents, including:  First-time issuance  Renewal of expired documents  Replacement of lost or damaged documents

Indicator formula: [PER: 푷풆풓풄풆풏풕풂품풆 # 풐풇 풏풂풕풊풐풏풂풍 풗풊풄풕풊풎풔 풐풇 풉풖풎풂풏 풕풓풂풇풇풊풄풌풊풏품 풘풉풐 풂풓풆 품풓풂풏풕풆풅 풇풓풆풆 풊풅풆풏풕풊풕풚 풓풆품풊풔풕풓풂풕풊풐풏

풕풐풕풂풍 # 풐풇 풖풏풅풐풄풖풎풆풏풕풆풅 풗풖풍풏풆풓풂풃풍풆 풑풆풐풑풍풆 풘풉풐 풂풓풆 품풓풂풏풕풆풅 풇풓풆풆 풊풅풆풏풕풊풕풚 풓풆품풊풔풕풓풂풕풊풐풏. 푿100] 푷풆풓풄풆풏풕풂품풆 풄풐풗풆풓풆풅 = # 풐풇 풏 푎 풕풊풐풏풂풍 풗풊풄풕풊풎풔 풐풇 풕풓풂풇풇풊풄풌풊풏품 풘풉풐 풓풆풄풆풊풗풆 풗풂풍풊풅 풅 표 풄풖풎풆풏풕풔 풅풖풓풊풏품 풕풉풆 풑풆풓푖 풐풅

# 퐨퐟 퐧퐚퐭퐢퐨퐧퐚퐥 퐯i 퐜퐭퐢퐦퐬 퐨퐟 퐭퐫퐚퐟퐟퐢퐜퐤퐢퐧퐠 퐢퐝퐞퐧퐭퐢퐟퐢퐞퐝 퐰퐢퐭퐡퐨퐮퐭 퐯퐚퐥퐢퐝 풅풐풄풖풎풆풏풕풔 x 100]

Measurement Unit: Number of Victims Data Type: Quantitative Disaggregation: By sex; by age Goal: [DPS: Increase by "x" the number of national victims of trafficking in persons without documentation who receive identity documents compared to the previous period. [Absolute numbers are used if the number of cases is low.] Progressively increase the coverage of undocumented national victims of trafficking in persons who receive valid identity documents. When the number of identified victims is low, coverage will be reported in absolute terms; when it is higher, it will be reported as a percentage]- 14DATA COLLECTION Data source: Records, cases, folders or files of civil registry offices, immigration offices or other entities responsible for issuing identity documents.

Data collection method: Documentary review Frequency of reporting: Annual Verification method: Copy or link to reports or activity reports, or notes, articles or press releases from civil registry offices, immigration offices or other entities responsible for issuing identity documents that record the number of identity documents created and issued.

BASELINE

Baseline/Year:

GUIDELINES Guideline 26: Facilitate access to identity documents, including birth certificates, identification certificates, passports and other documents confirming a person's identity, and propose possible appropriate mechanisms to prevent and address statelessness, in order to protect human rights and enable access to the services and benefits to which individuals are entitled. LIMITATIONS Limitat