OECD - Government involvement in sustainability initiatives

2 

GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES: AN OVERVIEW © OECD 2026

31 July 2026 Key messages • Governments are increasingly engaging with sustainability initiatives amid a rapi dly expanding and complex landscape. Sustainability initiatives are multi-stakeholder, industry , or public schemes or programmes offering tools, guidance, requirements, or assessments that companies use as part of their responsible business conduct (RBC) due diligence, but which do not replace their own responsibilities. • Uncertainty regarding the scope, quality, and reliability of many initiatives can make it difficult for governments and policymakers to identify credible schemes and provide clarity on how they may support company compliance with legal and policy requirements. • Analysis of an OECD pilot database covering 1 078 sustainability initiativ es found that governments are not involved in the majority of initiatives’ governance, funding, or operations . Only 30% of initiatives involve government participation in at least one of t hese areas, while 70% operate without government involvement. • Governments most commonly engage with sustainability initiatives by referencing them in nonlegally binding policies, guidance, or recommendations to support or clarify thei r use. This applies to 71% of initiatives. Formal recognition of initiatives in legislation as a means of demonstrating compliance is less widespread. • Governments also consider sustainability initiatives as part of their decision making processes, including public procurement and trade or investment policy. However, there is currently no systematic data on the prevalence of such practices. • Sustainability initiatives are an important component of the broader policy toolk it for advancing RBC. Governments can draw on a range of engagement approaches depending on their policy objectives. Regardless of the form of engagement, governments should assess the credibil ity, scope, and effectiveness of initiatives before endorsing, recognising, or relying on them in decision making. They are also well positioned to support further analysis of h ow government involvement influences the quality, effectiveness, and uptake of sustainability initiatives.

Government involvement in sustainability initiatives: An overview 3

scope, and effectiveness of initiatives before endorsing, recognising, or relying on them in decision making. They are also well positioned to support further analysis of h ow government involvement influences the quality, effectiveness, and uptake of sustainability initiatives.

Government involvement in sustainability initiatives: An overview 3

GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES: AN OVERVIEW © OECD 2026

Box 1. About this brief This policy brief provides a preliminary analysis of government involvement in sustai nability initiatives. Its main contribution is a categorisation of the different ways governments engage wi th initiatives, whether through their governance, funding or operations, or through the wider policy ecosystem. The analysis draws on an OECD pilot database of 1 078 sustainability initiatives identified through an AI-assisted methodology reviewing sustainability disclosures by the 500 larges t listed companies between 2020 and 2025. The brief uses this dataset to categorise types of government involveme nt in the initiatives referenced by these companies. This is a preliminary exercise rather than a comprehensive mapping. The finding s are based on early results from a pilot methodology and may be refined as the dataset is further d eveloped. Additionally, because governments can engage with initiatives through a wide range of policy instrumen ts (from legally to non-legally binding) and policy areas (including trade, investment an d public procurement), the brief does not attempt to quantify the full extent of engagement through this wider policy ecosystem. Instead, it uses practical examples to illustrate the range of government approaches across these areas. Future research could build on the categorisation set out in this brief in several directions: assessing the credibility and alignment of initiatives with due diligence standards, incl uding through the OECD’s forthcoming Fitness Framework for sustainability initiatives supporting due dili gence; examining more closely how and why governments reference initiatives in non-binding policy, and the characteristics of the initiatives they choose to reference; and comparing whether some forms of government engagement are more effective than others in advancing policy objectives. The involvement of government in sustainability initiatives

closely how and why governments reference initiatives in non-binding policy, and the characteristics of the initiatives they choose to reference; and comparing whether some forms of government engagement are more effective than others in advancing policy objectives. The involvement of government in sustainability initiatives Sustainability initiatives have steadily emerged as companies and gover nments seek to give consumers and investors greater clarity and confidence regarding the sustainability of pro ducts, companies, supply chains, and investments (OECD, 2022 [1]). From prominent initiatives like Green Button to the Forest Stewardship Council, a wide variety of sustainability initiatives are arising to help address these concerns. Sustainability initiatives are any multi-stakeholder, government-backed or ind ustry initiative, scheme or programme that provides tools, information, capacity building or otherwise facil itates, sets requirements for, or monitors, audits, verifies, assures, certifies, benchmarks or otherwise assesses business practices, sites or products in relation to sustainability objectives (i.e. objectives related to human rights, social or environmental impacts) (OECD, 2022[1]; OECD/ITC, 2024[2]). Sustainability requirements can also include requirements on due diligence processes or RBC issue areas, as well as provide policies, guidance, and tools to help businesses manage sustainability risks and impacts (OECD/ITC, 20 24[2]). For companies, sustainability initiatives can provide knowledge and resources to help manage supply chain risks and pool knowledge to reduce costs and improve efficiency of conducting due diligence. In the context of RBC due diligence, the objectives of sustainability initiatives can fall into two broad categories: facilitation initiatives and verification initiatives (OECD, 2022[1]). Facilitation initiatives refer to initiatives that facilitate or inform companies’ risk management and broader due diligence responsibilities, but do not monitor, assess, assure, verify or certify compa ny performance (OECD, 2022 [1]). They may, for example, provide information, tools and guidance, or set targets for companies.4 

GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES: AN OVERVIEW © OECD 2026

(OECD, 2022 [1]). They may, for example, provide information, tools and guidance, or set targets for companies.4 

GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES: AN OVERVIEW © OECD 2026

Verification initiatives refer to initiatives that set written requirements for companies or products and monitor, assess, verify, certify, assure or benchmark companies, sites, products, suppliers or other business partners against those requirements (OECD, 2022 [1]). Many initiatives blend a combination of facilitation and verification activities. This policy brief analyses both facilitation and verification initiatives, as well as initiatives that support both roles. For RBC, policymakers have identified sustainability initiatives as an importan t tool in the mix of policy options to help companies meet evolving requirements. Governments are engaging with sustai nability initiatives to help evaluate, recognise, and incentivise good business practic es against specific standards and to foster collaboration between relevant actors (OECD/ITC, 2024 [2]). Recent years have seen an increasing number of sustainability initiatives with governments at the helm or pl aying a more prominent role (see Figure 2 below). What are the opportunities and challenges for governments in leveraging sustainability initiatives for RBC? As sustainability initiatives continue to emerge across geographies, sectors, and commodities, the landscape becomes more complex (OECD, 2025 [3]). Although a comprehensive data set of sustainability initiatives does not exist, an OECD pilot study used an AI-assisted methodo logy to map sustainability initiatives. The study drew on sustainability disclosures by the 500 largest listed companies (2020 ‑2025), identifying 1 078 individual sustainability initiatives (OECD, 2026 [4]). Companies frequently reference different initiatives in their disclosures – with some companies citing nearly 100 initiatives. Individual initiatives command a substantial share of a market: for instance, cross-sectoral initiatives such as the Forest Stewardship Council are referenced by firms representing 50% of the market capital isation of the

different initiatives in their disclosures – with some companies citing nearly 100 initiatives. Individual initiatives command a substantial share of a market: for instance, cross-sectoral initiatives such as the Forest Stewardship Council are referenced by firms representing 50% of the market capital isation of the top 500 companies (OECD, 2026[4]). As sustainability initiatives have grown in number and reach, previous research has also highlighted the extent of government involvement in initiatives. For instance, a 2017 MSI Integrity study on 45 multi-stakeholder initiatives found that they operated in over 170 countries and engaged over 50 governments (OECD, 2022[1]). When well-designed, sustainability initiatives can support the implementatio n of due diligence responsibilities, whether that is through the evaluation of RBC performance base d upon rigorous criteria, or platforms that convene and exchange upon good practices. Yet, OECD alignment ass essments since 2016 indicate that sustainability initiatives differ significantly in scope, focus, quality and effectiveness, and in how far they integrate due diligence consistent with international standards ( OECD, 2022 [1]). Governments can thus face a lack of clarity when identifying and leveraging credible initiatives to recommend to businesses or to use in their own decision making. Sustainability initiatives operate within a broader governance ecosystem where internat ional, regional, or national legal instruments on sustainability share the same goal of promoting sus tainable development along value chains (OECD/ITC, 2024 [2]). Governments have a role to play as policymakers to provide flexibility for companies to use sustainability initiatives to support their implementation of RBC due diligence expectations. Beyond this, governments can help improve the quality and standardisation of initiat ives operating in their jurisdictions through consistent policy and guidance . Strengthening the credibility of sustainability initiatives can help ensure that companies are meeting national expec tations on RBC. A company’s use of s ustainability initiatives can also inform government decision making in areas suc h as public procurement, trade, and investment. At the same time, sustainability initiatives are only one possible

sustainability initiatives can help ensure that companies are meeting national expec tations on RBC. A company’s use of s ustainability initiatives can also inform government decision making in areas suc h as public procurement, trade, and investment. At the same time, sustainability initiatives are only one possible tool to promote sustainability and RBC, and that can be applied alongside other ap proaches (OECD, n.d.[5]). Despite the clear link between governments and sustainability initiatives , there has been no systematic analysis of the different ways that governments interact with sustainability initiatives. 5

GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES: AN OVERVIEW © OECD 2026

How are governments interacting with sustainability initiatives? To date, governments have been engaging with sustainability initiatives for various pu rposes. OECD research has identified numerous ways that governments are involved in sustainability initiatives: • Government ownership or creation. Government is the legal owner, founder or mandating authority of a sustainability initiative. For example, the German Federal Ministry for E conomic Co-operation and Development (BMZ) created the Green Button certification label for sustai nable textiles, which uses independent third-party assessment to evaluate whether compa nies take responsibility for respecting human rights and environmental standards in their s upply chains (Green Button, n.d.[6]). • Government commissioned or convened. Government has initiated, substantially structured, or funded the initiative without retaining formal ownership. Dayto-day operations and governance may be shared. Electronics Watch, for instance, emerged from an EU-funded in itiative with the goal of bringing together public buyers to promote and protect workers’ rights in gl obal supply chains. The governance is shared between public buyers, experts in human rights, l abour rights, trade union rights, environmental rights, occupational health and safety, and global supply chains, as well as representatives from CSOs and trade unions (Electronics Watch, n.d. [7]). • Government participation in governance. A government entity holds a formal seat in the initiative’s governance, as a board member, observer or advisory committee participant. The

as well as representatives from CSOs and trade unions (Electronics Watch, n.d. [7]). • Government participation in governance. A government entity holds a formal seat in the initiative’s governance, as a board member, observer or advisory committee participant. The Extractives Industries Transparency Initiative is a multi-stakeholder organis ation created to promote information disclosure along the extractive industry value chain which incl udes governments in its board . The EITI Board consists of 20 representatives from implementing countries, supporting countries, CSOs, industry, and institutional investors (EITI, n.d. [8]). Governments also interact through the wider policy ecosystem that the initiatives operate in: • Formal legislative or regulatory recognition. Government has formally recognised the initiative as a tool through which companies can meet legal requirements. One example is the recognition of the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) by the European Commission for Conflict Mineral s Regulation compliance (see Box 3). • Reference in non-legally binding policy instruments. Government references the initiative in guidance, policy frameworks, or voluntary tools without creating a legal compli ance function. The purpose may be to endorse or recommend an initiative, or to simply signal the initia tive as one possible tool to support business in meeting sustainability expectations. For instance, the Government of Canada developed guidance on how sustainability initiatives in the forestry sector, such as the Forest Stewardship Council, fit into the national legal context on forestry (see B ox 2). • Informing government decision making. Government considers a company’s participation in or certification by a sustainability initiative when conducting their own activiti es (such as public procurement, trade, and investment) . Governments can also promote the use of an initiative to help achieve a policy target (i.e. setting a threshold for percentage of companies with a certification or conformity assessment as part of a policy objective aiming to promote uptak e of RBC ). The ENERGY STAR certification used by US Government agencies in public procurements is one relevant example of this type of practice (see Box 4). The analysis presented in this paper on how governments engage with and in s ustainability initiatives is

or conformity assessment as part of a policy objective aiming to promote uptak e of RBC ). The ENERGY STAR certification used by US Government agencies in public procurements is one relevant example of this type of practice (see Box 4). The analysis presented in this paper on how governments engage with and in s ustainability initiatives is based on the OECD pilot study on 1078 unique sustainability initiatives. The mapping covered both facilitation and verification initiatives. It is not a comprehensive mapping of all sustainability initiatives, but features many initiatives currently being used by companies. The dataset is deriv ed from initiatives referenced in company disclosures between 2020 and 2025; in the future, the dataset ma y be further developed and refined. The analysis presented in this policy brief builds upon the OECD pilot study by looking at the involvement of government in the initiatives in the baseline dataset. It seeks to provide initial6 

GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES: AN OVERVIEW © OECD 2026

insights into how governments are engaging with sustainability initiatives, but does not examine the effects of government involvement. While governments engage in the governance, funding, or operations of sustainability initiatives, most initiatives still operate independently of government involvement A preliminary analysis of 1078 initiatives in the OECD’s pilot database found that governments owned or created; commissioned or convened; or participated in 323 initiatives (30% of initiatives from the pilot database). Many of these initiatives included several types of government involvem ent – for instance, a government commissioning an initiative as well as participating in its governanc e. On the other hand, 755 initiatives did not include government involvement ( 70% of initiatives from the pilot database )(see Figure 1). Figure 1. Most sustainability initiatives operate without government involvement Share of sustainability initiatives that involve government in their structure, funding or operations

Note: An initiative was counted if the research revealed at least one type of these types of involvement: government owned or created, government commissioned or convened, or government participation in governance.

Source: OECD analysis of pilot database on sustainability initiatives.

Share of sustainability initiatives that involve government in their structure, funding or operations

Note: An initiative was counted if the research revealed at least one type of these types of involvement: government owned or created, government commissioned or convened, or government participation in governance.

Source: OECD analysis of pilot database on sustainability initiatives.

Further analysis demonstrat es that the number of initiatives in recent years increased – as does the number of initiatives involving government. The majority of initiatives do not incl ude government involvement, and many initiatives without government involvement are established each year . Figure 2. Government involvement in initiatives has increased over time Number of sustainability initiatives created with government involvement in their structure, funding, or operations

Source: OECD analysis of pilot database on sustainability initiatives.

Yes 30% No 70% 0 5 10 15 20 1814 1865 1877 1894 1906 1919 1923 1929 1941 1946 1951 1960 1967 1971 1975 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020 Number of initiatives with government involvement Initiative's year founded 7

GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES: AN OVERVIEW © OECD 2026

Governments frequently reference sustainability initiatives in non-binding policy Aside from direct involvement in the sustainability initiative ( by owning or creating; commissioning or convening; and participating in), governments interact with the initiatives through their policies, for example by referencing initiatives or by allowing companies to demonstrate compliance wi th policy goals through sustainability initiatives. The OECD analysis of the pilot database revealed that references to sustainability initiatives (both verification and facilitation initiatives) in non-binding p olicy instruments are frequent: 71% of the sustainability initiatives were mentioned in government policies, guidances, an d policy dialogues around sustainable supply chains. This share may be higher in reality, as the preliminary analysis was primarily centred on publicly available government documents in English, and addit ional policies could

structure, funding, or operations and refers to it in non-binding policy Government not involved in intiative's structure, funding, or operations and does not refer to it in non-binding policy Government only refers to initiative in non-binding policy Government is only involved in intiatitive's structure, funding, or operations8 

GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES: AN OVERVIEW © OECD 2026

Box 2. Forest Stewardship Council features in Canadian Government guidance and policy The Canadian National Council for Air and Stream Improvement published a guidance document to navigate the complex and evolving Canadian forestry regulations and standards. Along with the relevant legislation and regulation, the guidance highlights three sustainable forest ma nagement certifications, including the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) which is applied to over 48 million hectares of land in Canada (NCASI, 2022[9]). The guidance highlights the voluntary nature of the certifications, which can supplement measures that address regulatory requirements at the federal and provincial levels (NCASI, 2022[9]). It also provides information on what the FSC is and its main principles. The FSC, founded in 1994, sets the standard for responsible forest stewardship to s upport healthy ecosystems and help protect the rights of workers, Indigenous Peoples, and local communiti es (FSC, n.d.[10]). According to the Canada Council of Forest Ministers, the FSC sets high thresho lds that forest companies must comply with, provides a stamp of approval for customers showing products originating from their forests meet high standards, has a thorough auditing process to issue certificat ions, and is tailored to consider global forestry issues as well as the local Canadian context (Government of Canada, 2025[11]).

Source: NCASI (2022 [9]), Canadian Forestry Regulations and Standards, https://ncasi.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/NCASI18_CanForestReg_2021rev1_web.pdf.

of the sustainability initiatives were mentioned in government policies, guidances, an d policy dialogues around sustainable supply chains. This share may be higher in reality, as the preliminary analysis was primarily centred on publicly available government documents in English, and addit ional policies could exist with references to initiatives in other languages that present research was unable to cover. Of the 71% of sustainability initiatives that government references in non-binding policy, al most half are cases where the government is both involved in the governance, funding, or operations of an initiative and refers to it in non-binding policy (see Figure 3). This demonstrates how some governments are supporting initiatives structurally as well as promoting their use, or how governments are using their own policy frameworks to promote initiatives they have established themselves. In fact, only 3 % of initiatives are not referenced in policy when the government is a part of its structure, funding, or operations – supporting a preliminary finding that governments participating in an initiative are more likely t o promote it. However, governments are still citing initiatives they are not involved in structurally. More than a quarter of initiatives do not involve any government interaction. Figure 3 demonstrates this breakdown. Figure 3. Governments adopt different approaches to engaging with sustainability initiatives Share of sustainability initiatives with government involvement and / or references in non-binding policy

Source: OECD analysis of pilot database on sustainability initiatives.

Across countries, sustainability initiatives feature in non-binding policy i nstruments representing a variety of sectors, supply chains, or commodities. Often, governments reference initiatives that are particularly relevant for the country context – for instance, covering a prominent industry or commodity. provides an example of a government highlighting how a sustainability initiative fits into the national legal context and relevant standards on forestry. 27% 41% 3% 29% Government involved in intiative's structure, funding, or operations and refers to it in non-binding policy Government not involved in intiative's structure, funding, or operations and does not refer to it in non-binding policy Government only refers to initiative in non-binding policy Government is only

2025[11]).

Source: NCASI (2022 [9]), Canadian Forestry Regulations and Standards, https://ncasi.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/NCASI18_CanForestReg_2021rev1_web.pdf.

FSC (n.d.[10]), About us, https://fsc.org/en/about-us. Government of Canada (2025 [11]), Forest management certification in Canada, https://natural-resources.canada.ca/forestsforestry/sustainable-forest-management/forest-management-certification-canada. Governments formally recognise sustainability initiatives in legislation Another way that governments provide (more formal) recognition of a verification initiative is through references in legislation. This includes mentioning an initiative as a tool to help support compliance or declaring their equivalence when complying with legal obligations. Given the stringent process that governments typically take to assess sustainability initiatives for equiva lence, this is not currently a prevalent practice, but rather one possible option for governments in the smart mix (see Box 3 below). A concern around formal recognition in legislation is the risk of creating safe harbours from liability for companies who participate in an initiative (OECD, 2022 [1]). Participating in an initiative, even one wellaligned and credible, is not a guarantee of the responsible conduct of a company (OECD, 2022[1]). The OECD’s analysis of the initiatives in the pilot database revealed that just over 15% of initiatives had legislative or regulatory recognition, but not all of these initiatives were determined as equivalent for compliance (i.e. an initiative could be recommended through the legislation as a tool). Box 3 provides an example of a regulation formally recognising a sustainability initiative through a n assessment process. 9

GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SUSTAINABILITY INITIATIVES: AN OVERVIEW © OECD 2026

Box 3. The Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is recognised by the European Commission for Conflict Minerals Regulation Compliance The Conflict Minerals Regulation (CMR), passed in 2017 with its core due diligence obligations applying

Box 3. The Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) is recognised by the European Commission for Conflict Minerals Regulation Compliance The Conflict Minerals Regulation (CMR), passed in 2017 with its core due diligence obligations applying from 2021, aims to stop imports of conflict minerals and metals and to ens ure that global and EU smelters and refiners source tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (3TG) responsibly (Europea n Commission, 2017[12]; Regulation (EU) 2017/821, 2017[13]). The regulation requires EU-based importers to source 3TG from responsible sources only, conducting risk-based due dilige nce in line with the OECD’s Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD, 2016[14]). Under Article 8 of the Regulation, sustainability initiatives may apply to the Commission for recognition (Regulation (EU) 2017/821, 2017 [13]). The Commission assesses applications from sustainability initiatives under Commission Delegated Regul ation (EU) 2019/429, whose criteria are closely aligned with the OECD Alignment Assessment (OECD, 2024[15]) to evaluate sustainability initiatives. Recognised initiatives can help importers compl y with CMR requirements by providing independent third-party assurance. EU importers sourcing exclusively from smelters and refiners listed as conformant with a recognised sustainability initiative are exempted from carrying out their own third-party audit. Their other due diligence obligations, such as risk management, informationsharing with downstream purchasers, and public reporting, still apply. The RMI, through its Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (RMAP), is the first sustaina bility initiative to be officially recognised by the EC under the CMR. In 2025, the EC f ound that the RMI’s RMAP standards for 3TG are “fully aligned” with the requirements of the CMR, using an OECD-informed assessment approach (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/2071, 2025 [16]; RMI, 2025[17]).

RMAP standards for 3TG are “fully aligned” with the requirements of the CMR, using an OECD-informed assessment approach (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/2071, 2025 [16]; RMI, 2025[17]).

Source: European Commission (2017 [12]), Conflict Minerals Regulation, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/development-andsustainability/conflict-minerals-regulation_en.

Regulation (EU) 2017/821 (2017[13]), Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/821/oj/eng. Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/71 (2025[16]), Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/71 of 16 October 2025 on the recognition of e