🇨🇴⚖️ La Rama Judicial valida a Ariel en prueba de concepto de IA. Conoce los resultados aquí

WADA - International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII)

Agencia Mundial Antidopaje

Icono de documento PDF

Descargar PDF

Disponible

Detalles

Título
WADA - International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII)
Autor
Agencia Mundial Antidopaje
Categoría
Infralegal
Área del derecho
Deporte
Año

World Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 2/15

International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations The World Anti -Doping Code International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations is a mandatory International Standard developed as part of the World Anti -Doping Program. It was developed in consultation with Signatories, public authorities, Athletes, and other relevant stakeholders. The International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations was first adopted and approved by the WADA Executive Committee at the sixth World Conference on Doping in Sport in Busan on 5 December 2025 and is effective as of 1 January 2027.

Published by: World Anti-Doping Agency

Stock Exchange Tower 800 Place Victoria (Suite 1700) PO Box 120 Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 0B4

www.wada-ama.org

Tel: +1 514 904 9232

Fax: +1 514 904 8650

E-mail: code@wada-ama.orgWorld Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 3/15

Table of Contents PART ONE: INTRODUCTION, CODE PROVISIONS, AND INTERPRETATION .............................. 4 1.0 Introduction and Scope ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 4 2.0 Code Provisions ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 4 3.0 Interpretation ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 4

PART TWO: STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENCE GATHERING AND THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS ................................ ................................ ........................ 6 4.0 Raw Information and Anti-Doping Intelligence ................................ ................................ .. 6 4.1 Objective ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 6 4.2 Collection, Storage and Sharing ................................ ................................ ................... 6 4.3 Assessment and Use ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 7

4.0 Raw Information and Anti-Doping Intelligence ................................ ................................ .. 6 4.1 Objective ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 6 4.2 Collection, Storage and Sharing ................................ ................................ ................... 6 4.3 Assessment and Use ................................ ................................ ................................ ... 7 5.0 Investigations ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 8 5.1 Objective ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 8 5.2 Purpose ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 8 5.3 Conducting Investigations ................................ ................................ ............................ 8 5.4 Cooperating with an Investigation ................................ ................................ .............. 10 5.5 Investigation Outcomes................................ ................................ .............................. 10 APPENDIX 1: DEFINITIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 12World Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 4/15

PART ONE: INTRODUCTION, CODE PROVISIONS, AND INTERPRETATION 1.0 Introduction and Scope The International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations is a mandatory International Standard developed as part of the World Anti -Doping Program. It was developed in consultation with Signatories, public authorities, and other relevant stakeholders.

The International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations was first adopted and approved by the WADA Executive Committee at the World Anti -Doping Conference in Busan on 5 December 2025 and is effective as of 1 January 2027. The International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations sets out the core responsibilities of Anti-Doping Organizations regarding collecting, receiving, storing, and assessing Raw Information, using Anti-Doping Intelligence, and conducting investigations into possible antidoping rule violations, non-compliance of Signatories and WADA-accredited laboratories, and other activities that may facilitate doping. 2.0 Code Provisions The following Articles in the 2027 Code are directly relevant to the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations; they can be obtained by referring to the Code itself: − Code Article 2 Anti-Doping Rule Violations − Code Article 3 Proof of Doping − Code Article 5 Testing and Investigations − Code Article 8 Results Management : Right to a Fair Hearing and Notice of Hearing

Intelligence and Investigations; they can be obtained by referring to the Code itself: − Code Article 2 Anti-Doping Rule Violations − Code Article 3 Proof of Doping − Code Article 5 Testing and Investigations − Code Article 8 Results Management : Right to a Fair Hearing and Notice of Hearing Decision − Code Article 10 Sanctions on Individuals − Code Article 12 Sanctions by Signatories Against Other Sporting Bodies − Code Article 13 Results Management: Appeals − Code Article 14 Confidentiality and Reporting − Code Article 20 Additional Roles and Responsibilities of Signatories and WADA − Code Article 21 Additional Roles and Responsibilities of Athletes and Other Persons − Code Article 23 Acceptance and Implementation 3.0 Interpretation The official text of the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations shall be published in English and French. In the event of any conflict between the English and French versions, the English version shall prevail. Like the Code, the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations has been drafted giving consideration to the principles of proportionality, human rights, and other applicable legal principles. It shall be interpreted and applied in that light. The comments annotating various provisions of the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations shall be used to guide its interpretation.World Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 5/15 Unless otherwise specified, references to Articles are references to Articles of the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations. Terms used in this International Standard that are defined terms from the Code are italicized. Terms that are defined in this or another International Standard are underlined. Defined terms from the Code and International Standards that are used in the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations are found in Appendix I. The Appendix to the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations has the same mandatory status as the rest of the International Standard. The following terms used in the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations shall be interpreted as indicated: − “Shall” to indicate a mandatory requirement.

Standard for Intelligence and Investigations are found in Appendix I. The Appendix to the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations has the same mandatory status as the rest of the International Standard. The following terms used in the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations shall be interpreted as indicated: − “Shall” to indicate a mandatory requirement. − “Should” to indicate a recommendation.World Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 6/15

PART TWO: STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION AND INTELLIGENCE

GATHERING AND THE CONDUCT OF INVESTIGATIONS

4.0 Raw Information and Anti-Doping Intelligence 4.1 Objective Anti-Doping Organizations shall ensure they are able to collect, receive, store, and assess Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence, from all available sources, and then use such Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence to inform and guide their Anti-Doping Activities . The object ive of Article 4 is to establish what an AntiDoping Organization shall do to fulfill the minimum standards set out in this Article. [Comment to Article 4.1: While Testing will always remain an integral part of the anti-doping effort, Testing alone is not sufficient to detect and establish to the requisite standard all anti -doping rule violations identified in the Code. This means that Anti-Doping Organizations need to develop a capable intelligencegathering and investigation function. WADA has devised Guidelines for the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations to assist Anti-Doping Organizations in their efforts to comply with the Code and this International Standard.] 4.2 Collection, Storage and Sharing 4.2.1 Anti-Doping Organizations shall ensure that they are able to collect, receive, and store Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence from all available sources. [Comment to Article 4.2.1: Available sources of Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence include, but are not limited to, Athletes and Athlete Support Personnel and members of the

and store Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence from all available sources. [Comment to Article 4.2.1: Available sources of Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence include, but are not limited to, Athletes and Athlete Support Personnel and members of the public (e.g., by means of a confidential reporting platform like the WADA Speak Up platform), Sample Collection Personnel (whether via mission reports, incident reports, or otherwise), Doping Control Forms (including declarations made by Athletes), whereabouts data, laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, other Anti -Doping Organization s, WADA, National Federations, law enforcement, other regulatory and disciplinary bodies, and the media (in all its forms).] 4.2.2 Anti-Doping Organizations shall share Anti-Doping Intelligence with other AntiDoping Organization s in a secure manner (e.g. , encryption) where such disclosure allows the Anti-Doping Organization receiving the intelligence to fulfill its obligations under the Code and/or the International Standards. Where an Anti-Doping Organization shares Anti-Doping Intelligence with another Anti-Doping Organization it shall do so in accordance with the International Standard for Data Protection and any relevant national data protection legislation. Anti -Doping Organizations shall share Anti-Doping Intelligence with other relevant authorities (e.g., law enforcement) on a need-to-know basis where appropriate and in accordance with the International Standard for Data Protection and applicable law. The sharing of Anti-Doping Intelligence may be delayed in exceptional and justified circumstances. [Comment to Article 4.2.2: Anti-Doping Intelligence should be shared with the relevant AntiDoping Organization(s) or other relevant authority(ies) as quickly as possible, and in as much detail as possible to maximize the value and benefit of that intelligence to the receiving AntiDoping Organization (s) or other relevant authority (ies). However, Anti-Doping Organizations may delay their disclosure of Anti-Doping Intelligence where there is a legitimate reason to do

detail as possible to maximize the value and benefit of that intelligence to the receiving AntiDoping Organization (s) or other relevant authority (ies). However, Anti-Doping Organizations may delay their disclosure of Anti-Doping Intelligence where there is a legitimate reason to do so (e.g., the immediate disclosure may compromise or adversely impact an ongoing investigation, intelligence operation or Results Management process).World Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 7/15 An example of a disclosure that is necessary to allow the recipient Anti-Doping Organization to fulfill its obligations under the Code and/or the International Standards is where the Anti-Doping Intelligence relates to an Athlete, Athlete Support Personnel, or other Person under the authority (e.g., Results Management jurisdiction) of the recipient Anti-Doping Organization. An example of an exceptional and justified circumstance not to share Anti-Doping Intelligence with another Anti -Doping Organization would be where the disclosure is likely to seriously compromise the status of an ongoing investigation , or likely to reveal the identity of a Confidential Human Source, or where the intelligence to be disclosed had been received by the first Anti-Doping Organization as part of a Without Prejudice Agreement. Nothing in this Article prevents an Anti-Doping Organization from sharing Raw Information with an Anti -Doping Organization or other relevant authority where the Anti -Doping Organization reasonably believes that the Raw Information will likely assist the Anti-Doping Activities of the recipient Anti-Doping Organization , or the work of the other relevant authority. Any such disclosure of Raw Information shall be done in accordance with the International Standard for Data Protection.] 4.2.3 Anti-Doping Organizations shall have policies and procedures in place to ensure that the Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence in its possession is handled securely, confidentially and shared with other AntiDoping Organizations or any relevant authority (e.g., law enforcement) where appropriate and in accordance with the International Standard for Data Protection and any relevant national data protection legislation.

ensure that the Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence in its possession is handled securely, confidentially and shared with other AntiDoping Organizations or any relevant authority (e.g., law enforcement) where appropriate and in accordance with the International Standard for Data Protection and any relevant national data protection legislation. [Comment to Article 4.2.3: WADA has devised applicable templates – housed within the Guidelines for the International Standard for Intelligence and Investigation s – to assist AntiDoping Organizations comply with Article 4.2.3.] 4.2.4 If an Anti-Doping Organization manages a Confidential Human Source, the Anti-Doping Organization shall have a policy and procedure in place for the handling, management, and use of Confidential Human Sources. [Comment to Article 4.2.4: To assist Anti-Doping Organizations in their use and management of Confidential Human Sources , WADA has published the ISII Guideline – Human Source Management on its website along with an applicable template.] 4.2.5 Anti-Doping Organizations shall not disclose or confirm the identity of a Confidential Human Source except where such disclosure is required by law or with the informed written consent of the Confidential Human Source. 4.3 Assessment and Use 4.3.1 Anti-Doping Organizations shall ensure they can assess the relevance and reliability of the Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence that they collect and receive. [Comment to Article 4.3.1: An example of how to assess reliability would be to consider the nature of the source of information, the circumstances in which the information had been provided, and whether there is any supporting or corroborating information or evidence. There are also databases and case management systems that may be used to assist in the organization, Processing, analysis, and cross-referencing of such intelligence.] 4.3.2 Anti-Doping Organizations shall use Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence to inform and guide their Anti-Doping Activities.

are also databases and case management systems that may be used to assist in the organization, Processing, analysis, and cross-referencing of such intelligence.] 4.3.2 Anti-Doping Organizations shall use Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence to inform and guide their Anti-Doping Activities. [Comment to Article 4.3.2: An example of the use that can be made of Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence is that outlined in Article 12 of the International Standard for TestingWorld Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 8/15 (i.e., to inform the development of an effective, intelligent, and proportionate Test Distribution Plan and to plan Target Testing). Moreover, Anti-Doping Organizations should recognize that although Raw Information may not contain direct evidence of an anti -doping rule violation, investigative steps should be taken to follow up on information that could lead to direct or indirect evidence of an anti-doping rule violation.] 5.0 Investigations 5.1 Objective Investigations conducted by an Anti-Doping Organization under the Code shall be based on the minimum standards set out in this Article. 5.2 Purpose In acknowledgement of the fundamental right of an Athlete to participate in doping-free sport, the purpose of an investigation includes, but is not limited to, gathering sufficient evidence to prove or disprove that an anti-doping rule violation has been committed. In the case of an investigation conducted by WADA per Code Article 20. 8.15, that purpose includes, but is not limited to, establishing whether a Signatory has or has not committed a breach of the Code or any International Standard. 5.3 Conducting Investigations 5.3.1 Anti-Doping Organizations shall conduct investigations, within the scope of their authority, where there is reasonable cause to believe an anti-doping rule violation or other relevant breach of the Code or applicable International Standard (e.g., whereabouts failure , violation of Code Article 10.14.1, etc.)

their authority, where there is reasonable cause to believe an anti-doping rule violation or other relevant breach of the Code or applicable International Standard (e.g., whereabouts failure , violation of Code Article 10.14.1, etc.) may have occurred. Where an International Standard, Technical Document or other relevant WADA document requires specific review protocols, AntiDoping Organizations shall follow such protocols as part of their investigation. [Comment to Article 5.3.1: “Reasonable cause” means there is a credible and justifiable basis to believe that a breach of the Code or applicable International Standard may have occurred. It requires more than a hunch or speculation, but not conclusive proof. Anti-Doping Organizations shall assess and document their decision to proceed – or not – with an investigation.] 5.3.2 Anti-Doping Organizations should ensure all investigations are conducted by individuals with investigative qualifications or experience. [Comment to Article 5.3.2: WADA’s Global Learning and Development Framework provides accessible and standardized training for a range of anti-doping roles, including investigation, to all Anti-Doping Organizations and other stakeholders worldwide.] 5.3.3 Anti-Doping Organizations shall conduct each investigation impartially, objectively, and with an open mind. [Comment to Article 5.3.3: Investigations shall not be conducted with a closed mind, pursuing only one outcome (e.g., proving that an Athlete had committed an anti-doping rule violation). Rather, investigators will consider all possible outcomes at each stage of the investigation, seeking to gather not only evidence indicating that there is a case to answer, but also any evidence indicating that there is no case to answer.] 5.3.4 Anti-Doping Organizations shall have policies and procedures in place for conducting investigations, especially when it comes to Protected Persons and Minors, for which those policies and procedures should reflect the fact that theWorld Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 9/15 Code treats Protected Persons and Minors differently than other Athletes or Persons in certain circumstances.

Minors, for which those policies and procedures should reflect the fact that theWorld Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 9/15 Code treats Protected Persons and Minors differently than other Athletes or Persons in certain circumstances. 5.3.5 Anti-Doping Organizations should plan each investigation and make use of all investigative resources and powers available to them. This may include obtaining Raw Information, Anti-Doping Intelligence, or evidence from other Anti-Doping Organizations or other relevant authorities (e.g., law enforcement), or exercising powers conferred to the Anti-Doping Organization under applicable rules (e.g., the power to demand production of relevant documents and information) . An investigation plan is important because it helps identify the resources and avenues of enquiry necessary to complete the investigation in a competent and timely manner. [Comment to Article 5.3.5: While notification of an Adverse Analytical Finding or other potential anti-doping rule violation is commonly done by letter alone, this practice does not maximize the use of available investigative resources, rather, it may decrease the chances of gatheri ng evidence relevant to whether the Athlete has or has not committed an anti-doping rule violation. In an appropriate case (e.g., an Adverse Analytical Finding involving a professional or International-Level Athlete), the letter notifying the Athlete of an Adverse Analytical Finding, or a potential anti-doping rule violation should be delivered directly to the Athlete. During delivery, the content of the notification letter and the benefits of Code Article 10.7.1 (Substantial Assistance in discovering or establishing Code Violations) should be explained to the Athlete with or by an investigator.] 5.3.6 To ensure the preservation of evidence and any relevant Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence in relation to a potential breach of the Code or International Standards , Anti-Doping Organizations should conduct investigations in a timely manner and without undue delay.

with or by an investigator.] 5.3.6 To ensure the preservation of evidence and any relevant Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence in relation to a potential breach of the Code or International Standards , Anti-Doping Organizations should conduct investigations in a timely manner and without undue delay. [Comment to Article 5.3.6: Factors which may reasonably impact the length of an investigation include, but are not limited to, the complexity of the investigation, the seriousness of the allegation, the involvement of evidence or assistance provided pursuant to Code Article 10.7.1, the availability of resources to the investigating Anti-doping Organization, or the involvement of law enforcement (e.g., law enforcement may request an Anti-Doping Organization to pause its investigation so as not to interfere with the law enforcement investigation).] 5.3.7 Anti-Doping Organizations shall gather and preserve all relevant Raw Information, Anti-Doping Intelligence, and evidence as soon as possible to develop such material into further lines of enquiry and/or reliable evidence in relation to the subject matter of the investigation. 5.3.8 Anti-Doping Organizations shall treat the Raw Information, Anti-Doping Intelligence, and evidence obtained during an investigation confidentially and only share such where appropriate , on a need -to-know basis, and in accordance with the International Standard for Data Protection and applicable law (see also Article 4.2.2). [Comment to Article 5.3.8: When determining who has a need-to-know for investigation-related Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence or evidence, the Anti -Doping Organization should consider whether the recipient has a legitimate purpose considering the recipient’s role and responsibilities at that point in the investigation. An appropriate sharing of Raw Information and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence by an Anti -Doping Organization would include circumstances where the disclosure would likely help the recipient Anti -Doping Organization conduct its AntiDoping Activities.]World Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 10/15

and/or Anti-Doping Intelligence by an Anti -Doping Organization would include circumstances where the disclosure would likely help the recipient Anti -Doping Organization conduct its AntiDoping Activities.]World Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 10/15 5.3.9 Anti-Doping Organizations shall document the conduct of an investigation, the evidence identified in that investigation, and the outcome of that investigation. [Comment to Article 5.3.9: Documenting the conduct of an investigation may include, where applicable, obtaining a statement or conducting an interview with a relevant Person, and making a record of the enquiries conducted by an investigator.] 5.4 Cooperating with an Investigation 5.4.1 Signatories shall, per Code Article 20 , cooperate with relevant national organizations and agencies and other Anti-Doping Organizations. Where the Signatory fails to cooperate with an investigation being conducted by an AntiDoping Organization, that lack of cooperation should be reported to WADA as the entity responsible for monitoring compliance by Code Signatories. 5.4.2 Athletes and Athlete Support Personnel shall, per Code Article 21, cooperate with investigations conducted by Anti-Doping Organizations. Where the failure to cooperate amounts to a potential anti -doping rule violation (e.g., by providing false or misleading information, the destruction of potential evidence, or discouraging another Person from providing information that is relevant to the investigation) the Anti-Doping Organization shall investigate and pursue the anti -doping rule violation pursuant to the Code and relevant International Standard against the Athlete or Athlete Support Personnel for violation of any applicable anti-doping r ule violation (e.g., Code Article 2.5 (Tampering or Attempted Tampering)). Where the failure to cooperate does not amount to a n anti-doping rule violation, disciplinary action may be taken against the Athlete or Athlete Support Person under any other applicable rules. [Comment to Article 5.4.2: The requirement for cooperation shall respect appropriate procedural

not amount to a n anti-doping rule violation, disciplinary action may be taken against the Athlete or Athlete Support Person under any other applicable rules. [Comment to Article 5.4.2: The requirement for cooperation shall respect appropriate procedural safeguards (including without limitation the right not to self -incriminate and the right to be represented by counsel at the Person’s own expense). Any other applicable rules could include, but are not limited to, Code of Conduct, safety, or medical rules.] 5.5 Investigation Outcomes 5.5.1 Anti-Doping Organization s shall decide without undue delay whether proceedings should be brought against the Athlete, Athlete Support Personnel, or other Person for any potential anti -doping rule violation , whereabouts failure and/or violation of Code Article 10.14.1. Further, as set out in Code Article 13.3, if an Anti-Doping Organization fails to make such decision within a reasonable deadline set by WADA, then WADA may elect to appeal directly to CAS as if the Anti-Doping Organization had rendered a decision finding that no anti -doping rule violation has been committed. As noted in the comment to Code Article 13.3, however, before taking such action WADA will consult with the Anti-Doping Organization and give it an opportunity to explain why it has not yet rendered a decision. 5.5.2 Where the Anti-Doping Organization concludes based on the results of its investigation that an anti-doping rule violation , whereabouts failure and/or violations of Code Article 10.14.1 should be brought against the Athlete,World Anti-Doping Agency – 2027 International Standard for Intelligence and Investigations (ISII) Page 11/15 Athlete Support Personnel or other Person, it shall promptly notify the Athlete, Athlete Support Personnel or other Person of the potential anti-doping rule violation, whereabouts failure and/or violations of Code Article 10.14.1 and shall bring forward the proceedings against the Athlete, Athlete Support

Athlete Support Personnel or other Person, it shall promptly notify the Athlete, Athlete Support Personnel or other Person of the potential anti-doping rule violation, whereabouts failure and/or violations of Code Article 10.14.1 and shall bring forward the proceedings against the Athlete, Athlete Support Personnel or other Person in the manner set out in the International Standard for Results Management. 5.5.3 Where the Anti-Doping Organization concludes, based on the results of its investigation, that an anti -doping rule violation , whereabouts failure and/or violation of Code Article 10.14.1 should not be brought forward against the Athlete, Athlete Support Personnel or other Person: 5.5.3.1 It shall notify WADA and the Athlete’s or other Person’s International Federation and National Anti-Doping Organization in writing of that decision, with reasons, in accordance with Code Article 14.2.1 and the International Standard for Results Management. 5.5.3.2 It shall provide all such other information about the investigation as is required by WADA and/or the International Federation and/or National Anti -Doping Organization to determine whether to appeal against that decision. 5.5.3.3 In any event, it shall cons

Consultar sobre este documento ...